{"id":1001,"date":"2012-09-05T15:59:08","date_gmt":"2012-09-05T19:59:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mapsurfer.com\/blog\/?p=1001"},"modified":"2012-09-05T16:15:22","modified_gmt":"2012-09-05T20:15:22","slug":"1958-rosie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.puzzlemaze.org\/df\/blog\/archives\/1001","title":{"rendered":"1958 Rosie"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Lots goin&#8217; on here, so lets roll it.\u00a0 We don&#8217;t do &#8220;stories&#8221; here anymore, but if we did, that is what this would be.\u00a0 First problem &#8212; this post scrolls off that beautiful &#8220;11 Silvers Today&#8221; link under &#8220;Recent Posts&#8221;.\u00a0 Oh well, all things must pass.<\/p>\n<p>So, today, back to &#8220;Chester County&#8217;s hardest silver site&#8221;, and why not, if it gives up the shiny once in awhile? And the first target of the day was a slam dunk 1958 rosie.\u00a0 Are you kidding me?\u00a0 This is either a win for my skill of reading the site to find the location of the slam dunk silver, or inserting my 13 inch unit into the right place,\u00a0 I&#8217;m betting on the latter.\u00a0 The Detech Ultimate 13 coil is a winner &#8212; now pulling 3 silvers out of this hunted out park. (2 others were circumstantial; 2 others were my skill &#8212; that makes 7, which, in my logging system, makes it a auto-loggable site, meaning I have to edit the database (yuck).\u00a0 Who would have thunk it (are you kidding me? &#8212; the spelling checker took that &#8212; chalk one up for modern linguistics!)\u00a0 that &#8220;Chester County&#8217;s hardest silver site&#8221; would become loggable.\u00a0 One of my best sites now (23rd on the list; admittedly a far cry from the top 2, at 140 and 127, respectively)).\u00a0 So, that paragraph is why we don&#8217;t do stories anymore.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.puzzlemaze.org\/df\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/09\/090512.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1002\" title=\"090512\" src=\"http:\/\/www.puzzlemaze.org\/df\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/09\/090512.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"261\" height=\"263\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.puzzlemaze.org\/df\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/09\/090512.jpg 261w, https:\/\/www.puzzlemaze.org\/df\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/09\/090512-150x150.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 261px) 100vw, 261px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>So, we titled the entry &#8220;1958 rosie&#8221;, and above it is, and its cool cause I&#8217;ve been looking to fill this hole in my dug rosie album for quite some time.\u00a0 Previously, I&#8217;ve dug all the rosies without a mintmark (and most with a mintmark), but could never dig a 1958.\u00a0 Now we got one.\u00a0 Woohoo! (And only 8 in the entire series (all with mintmarks), remain to complete this goal).<\/p>\n<p>But, there&#8217;s more.\u00a0 It wouldn&#8217;t be a story (of course, it isn&#8217;t a story, just a post that is like what used to be a story, since stories are defunct), if there wasn&#8217;t a &#8220;more&#8221;, and that &#8220;more&#8221; is this:\u00a0 When I was detecting &#8220;Chester County&#8217;s hardest silver site&#8221; today, (a public park, BTW, to the newbies to &#8220;randy&#8217;s Metal Detecting Blog&#8221;), some dude comes up to me and sayz &#8212; he&#8217;s with some local historical society and is looking for a metal detectorist to detect the site of an amusement park that was closed down 100 years ago.\u00a0 How cool is that?\u00a0 Are you kidding me?\u00a0 I sayz yeah &#8211;I&#8217;ll do it (wouldn&#8217;t you?).\u00a0 The bad news is that my own research (surprised that someone who could write asinine stories could do intelligent research?) located the site, and suggests that it is a very hard site, due to massive undergrowth.\u00a0 Oh well.<\/p>\n<p>But of course I&#8217;ll do it.\u00a0 It will be fun, and it never hurts to get in good with the municipal and historical society elders, and do the right thing and help them (forget the fact that an economist just wrote this post :-)).\u00a0 Good karma from our hobby is a good thing.\u00a0 Don&#8217;t you agree?<\/p>\n<p>But, amazingly, there&#8217;s more.\u00a0 And that &#8220;more&#8221; is what this post was gonna be, before I unexpectedly was able to get out for a couple hours today; it was to be an entry in the &#8220;Friday Afternoon Album&#8221; category for a change.\u00a0 And, it was to be titled &#8220;The Holy Trinity&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Those who used to read my FB posts regarding the FAA know the Holy Trinity to be Sandy Denny, Annie, Haslam, and Maddy Prior.\u00a0 But, what if there we&#8217;re a fourth member?\u00a0 I&#8217;d always thought such a fourth member would be Pat Benetar (and no one can belt it as high and loud as she can, even the Trinity), but the songwriting (and her insistence on following such lame songwriting, rather than doing something majesticly great with those pipes, always disqualified her in my mind), but there is now, not a 4th member, but a 4th nominee, and that is Florence Welsh (better known as &#8220;Florence and the Machine&#8221;).\u00a0 Are you kidding me?\u00a0 Have you heard this stuff?\u00a0 Yeah, the songwriting still mostly sucks (but it has its moments), but at least it is early in her career.\u00a0 There is time, and her vox is magic.\u00a0 Imagine Flo Welsh fronting a band with Richard Thompson on axe and Ashley Hutchings on song selections and arrangements.\u00a0 Are you kidding me?\u00a0 I don&#8217;t believe in heaven, but if I did, and such heaven excluded the Holy Trinity, that would be my vision of it.<\/p>\n<p>So, why does this matter?\u00a0 Cause I need a 4 for some letterbox clues.\u00a0 The obvious 4 is the elements, but its too cliche and too overdone.\u00a0 So, I was thinking of doing the Holy Trinity (assuming I could find someone to carve it).\u00a0 One problem, &#8220;trinity&#8221; doesn&#8217;t exactly equal 4, (but close enough for the target audience).\u00a0 Its a question of who to make the 4th?<\/p>\n<p>Pat Benetar doesn&#8217;t make the cut.\u00a0 Florence Welch has the voice of a goddess, and is Trinity worthy, but doesn&#8217;t have enough history, so, I&#8217;ve decided to make the 4th member Serj Tankian.\u00a0 Bet ya didn&#8217;t see that coming.\u00a0 Who sayz they all have to be girls?\u00a0 Serj is likely the best male rock vocalist of all time (yeah Ronnie James Dio is in there too), and again, despite some catastrophically bad songwriting (but enough good songwriting to make up for it), he has earned the spot.\u00a0 So, that is the 4 for my letterboxing clues.\u00a0 We&#8217;ll see if anyone carves them.<\/p>\n<p>Nailed it baby!\u00a0 We&#8217;ll maybe not, but <em>exactly<\/em> what <em>I<\/em> wanted to do.\u00a0 Now, a break from detecting.\u00a0 And, the best part is, that if someone googles &#8220;Sandy Denny, Annie Haslam, Maddy Prior, Florence Welch (or Serj Tankian (what are the odds?))&#8221;, this page will likely end up on top.\u00a0 How cool is that?\u00a0 If you are that person, e-mail me.\u00a0 (Yeah, nailed it, but what sucks is that this entry will be fronting the blog for a week.\u00a0 I have something cool to post in the next couple of days to prevent that :))<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lots goin&#8217; on here, so lets roll it.\u00a0 We don&#8217;t do &#8220;stories&#8221; here anymore, but if we did, that is what this would be.\u00a0 First problem &#8212; this post scrolls off that beautiful &#8220;11 Silvers Today&#8221; link under &#8220;Recent Posts&#8221;.\u00a0 &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.puzzlemaze.org\/df\/blog\/archives\/1001\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.puzzlemaze.org\/df\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1001"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.puzzlemaze.org\/df\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.puzzlemaze.org\/df\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.puzzlemaze.org\/df\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.puzzlemaze.org\/df\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1001"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.puzzlemaze.org\/df\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1001\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1004,"href":"https:\/\/www.puzzlemaze.org\/df\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1001\/revisions\/1004"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.puzzlemaze.org\/df\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.puzzlemaze.org\/df\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1001"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.puzzlemaze.org\/df\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}